Please find below articles and books interested in digital ecologies.
- Adams, W. M. (2019) Geographies of conservation II: Technologies, surveillance and conservation by algorithm. Progress in Human Geography, 43(2): 337-350.
- Adams, W. M. (2020) Digital animals. The Philosopher 108(1): 17-21.
Altrudi, S. (2021) Connecting to nature through tech? The case of the iNaturalist app. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27(1): 124-141.
- Arts, K., van der Wal, R., and Adams, W.M. (2015) Digital technology and the conservation of nature. Ambio 44: 661-673.
- Ash, J., Kitchin, R. and Leszczynski, A. (2016) Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1): 25-43.
Bakker, K. and Ritts, M. (2018) Smart Earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governancefor environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 52: 201-211.
- Benson, E. (2010) Wired Wilderness: Technologies of Tracking and the Making of Modern Wildlife. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
- Benson, E. (2016) Trackable life: Data, sequence, and organism in movement ecology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 57: 137-147.
- Bergman, C. (2005) Inventing a beast with no body: Radio-telemetry, the marginalization of animals, and the simulation of ecology. Worldviews, 9(2): 255-270.
- Berland, J. (2019) Virtual Menageries: Animals as Mediators in Network Cultures. The MIT Press.
Blue, C. (2016) Public attunement with more-than-human Others: Witnessing the life and death of Bear 71. GeoHumanities, 2(1): 42-57.
- Brower, M. (2021) Exhibiting Digital Animalities. Public.
- Büscher, B. (2016) Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society, 18(5) pp. 726–43.
- Candea, M. (2010) ‘I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat’: engagement and detachment in human-animal relations. American Ethnologist 37(2): 241-258.
- Castellano, K. (2018) Anthropomorphism in the Anthropocene: Reassembling wildlife management data in Bear 71. Environmental Humanities, 10(1): 171–186.
- Chambers, C. (2007) “Well its remote, I suppose, innit?” The relational politics of bird-watching through the CCTV lens. Scottish Geographical Journal, 123(2): 122-134.
Coghlan, S. and Sparrow, L. (2020) The “digital animal intuition:” the ethics of violence against animals in video games. Ethics and Information Technology.
Coghlan, S., Webber, S., and Carter, M. (2021) Improving ethical attitudes to animals with digital technologies: the case of apes and zoos. Ethics and Information Technology.
- COVID-19 and Environmental Media. Special issue of Journal of Environmental Media, volume 1, issue 2.
- Davies, G. (2000) ‘Virtual animals in electronic zoos: The changing geographies of animal capture and display’, in C. Philo and C. Wilbert (eds), Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations, Routledge: London, 243-267.
- Dwyer, A.C. (2021) Cybersecurity’s grammars: A more-than-human geopolitics of computation. Area, OnlineFirst.
Elwood, S. and Leszczynski, A. (2018) Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place & Culture, 25(5): 629-644.
- Fish, A. (2020) Crash theory: Entrapments of conservation drones and endangered megafauna. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(2): 425-451.
- Gabrys, J. (2014) Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1): 30-48.
- Gabrys, J. (2016) Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. University of Minnesota Press.
- Gabrys, J. (2019) Sensors and sensing practices: Reworking experience across entities, environments and technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values 44(5): 723-736.
- Gabrys, J. (2021) The forest that walks: Digital fieldwork and distributions of Site. Qualitative Inquiry. OnlineFirst.
- Goodman, M., Littler, J., Brockington, D. and Boykoff, M. (2016) Spectacular environmentalisms: media, knowledge and the framing of ecological politics. Environmental Communication, 10(6): 677-688.
- Gray, J. (2020) ‘The datafication of forests? From the wood wide web to the internet of trees.’ In Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel (eds), Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Hawkins, R. and Silver, J. (2017) From selfie to #sealfie: Nature 2.0 and the digital cultural politics of an internationally contested resource. Geoforum, 79: 114-123.
- Jarić, I., Correia, R.A., Brook, B.W., Buettel, J.C., Courchamp, F. […], Roll, U. (2020) iEcology: Harnessing large online resources to generate ecological insights. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 35(7): 630-639.
- Jørgensen, F.A. (2014) The armchair traveler’s guide to digital environmental humanities. Environmental Humanities 4(1): 95-112.
- Kamphof, I. (2011) Webcams to save nature: Online space as affective and ethical space. Foundations of Science 16(2-3): 259-274.
- Kamphof, I. (2013) Linking animal and human places: The potential of webcams for species companionship. Animal Studies Journal, 2(1): 82-102.
- Kuntsman, A. and Rattle, I. (2019) Towards a paradigmatic shift in sustainability studies: A systematic review of peer reviewed literature and future agenda setting to consider environmental (un)sustainability of digital communication. Environmental Communication 13(5): 567-581.
Leszczynski, A. (2015) Spatial media/tion. Progress in Human Geography, 39(6): 729-751.
- Longdon, J. (2020) Environmental data justice. The Lancet, 4: e510-e511.
- Lorimer, J. (2010) Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies. Cultural Geographies, 17(2): 237-258.
Lunstrum, E. (2017) Feed them to the lions: Conservation violence goes online. Geoforum, 79, 134-143.
- Moss, T., Voigt, F., and Becker, S. (2021) Digital urban nature. City. OnlineFirst.
Mouton, M. and Rock, M. (2021) Governing cities as more-than-human entities. City, OnlineFirst.
- Nelson, I.L. (2017) Interspecies care and aging in a gorilla 2.0 world. Geoforum, 79: 144–152.
Nost, E. and Goldstein, J. (2021) A political ecology of data. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. OnlineFirst.
- Prebble, S., McLean, J., and Houston, D. (2021) Smart urban forests: An overview of more-than-human and more-than-real urban forest management in Australian cities. Digital Geography and Society. OnlineFirst.
Ritts, M. (2021) ‘Saturation as a Logic of Enclosure.’ In Melody Jue and Rafico Ruiz (eds.), Saturation: An Environmental Politics. Duke University Press: 144-158.
- Ritts, M., and Bakker, K. (2021) Conservation acoustics: Animal sounds, audible natures, cheap nature. Geoforum 124: 144-155.
- Rose, G. (2017) Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(4): 779-793.
- Roth, W.M. and Bowen, G.M. (1999) Digitizing lizards: The topology of ‘vision’ in ecological fieldwork. Social Studies of Science, 29(5): 719-764.
Rudolfi, M. and Poerting, J. (2020) Infrastructures of Ecological Evidence. Society and Space.
- Rutherford, S. and Bose, P. (2013) Biopower and Play: Bodies, Spaces, and Nature in Digital Games. Aether: The Journal of Media Geography, 12, 1-29.
- Sandbrook, C., Clark, D., Toivonen, T., Simlai, T., O’Donnell, S., Cobbe, J., and Adams, W.M. (2021) Principles for the socially responsible use of conservation monitoring technology and data. Conservation Science and Practice, 3, e374.
- Søraa, R.A., and Vik, J. (2021) Boundaryless boundary-objects: Digital fencing of the CyborGoat in rural Norway. Journal of Rural Studies 87: 23-31.
- Stinson, J. (2017) Re-creating Wilderness 2.0: Or getting back to work in a virtual nature. Geoforum 79: 174-187.
Tait, E. and Nelson, I. (2021) Nonscalability and generating digital outer space natures in No Man’s Skyouter space natures in No Man’s Sky. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. OnlineFirst.
- Turnbull, J., Searle, A., and Adams, W. M. (2020) Quarantine encounters with digital animals: More-than-human geographies of lockdown life. Journal of Environmental Media 1(2): 6.1-10.
- Taffel, S. (2019) Digital Media Ecologies: Entanglements of Content, Code and Hardware. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Taffel, S. (2022) AirPods and the earth: Digital technologies, planned obsolescence and the Capitalocene. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. OnlineFirst.
- van der Wal, R. and Arts, K. (2015) Digital conservation: An introduction. Ambio 44: 517-521.
von Essen, E., Turnbull, J., Searle, A., Jørgensen, F.A., Hofmeester, T.R., and van der Wal, R. (2021) Wildlife in the Digital Anthropocene: Examining Human-Animal Relations through Surveillance Technologies. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. OnlineFirst.
- Verma, A., van der Wal, R. and Fischer, A. (2016) Imagining wildlife: New technologies and animal censuses, maps and museums. Geoforum 75: 75–86.
- Virtual Animals. Special issue of Antennae, issue 30, winter 2014.
Walker, D., Nost, E., Lemelin, A., Lave, R. and Dillon, L. (2018) Practicing environmental data justice: From DataRescue to Data Together. Geo: Geography and Environment, 5(2), e00061.
Share your reading suggestions with us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Roboto Regular Font Entry (Not displayed, do not remove)
Roboto Regular Italic Font Entry (Not displayed, do not remove)
Roboto Bold Font Entry (Not displayed, do not remove)
Roboto Bold Italic Font Entry (Not displayed, do not remove)
Arbutus Font Entry (Not displayed, do not remove)